Re: Problem on expire -o Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 19:16:02 -0600

Michael Gray (LabRat@i-link.net)
Sun, 17 Nov 1996 10:30:01 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jacques Jamain: "Re: INBOX Flag?"
Previous message: Bob Paddock: "Re: INBOX Flag?"
In reply to: Phil Crown: "Re: Problem on expire -o Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 19:16:02 -0600"

In article <aawiygzkgaCP092yn@peak.org>,
sthoenna@peak.org (A.R. & F.L. Scott-Thoennes) wrote:
>In article <qd2hyY5fat+P092yn@i-link.net>,
>LabRat@i-link.net (Michael Gray) wrote:
>>In article <S5nhyo3qBCaQ092yn@airmail.net>, pcrown@airmail.net (Phil Crown) wrote:
>
>Michael, consider changing your config file to have
>followup-attribution=In article %i,%?%f wrote:
>The %? breaks it into two lines if it is too long.

Sorry, it already is like that. Maybe something in the Yep/Boxer
combination is stepping on this?

-- 
=============================================================================
* LabRat@i-link.net                  * Just because you're paranoid doesn't *
* Michael.Gray@1201.ima.infomail.com * mean they're not out to get you      *
=============================================================================
I'm as innocent as a new-laid egg.

Next message: Jacques Jamain: "Re: INBOX Flag?"
Previous message: Bob Paddock: "Re: INBOX Flag?"
In reply to: Phil Crown: "Re: Problem on expire -o Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 19:16:02 -0600"