Re: file attachments

From: Debra Walker (debraw@wwa.com)
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 1997 17:40:49 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: David Meade: "Re: What are the differences between yarn89 and yarn92?"
Previous message: Debra Walker: "Re: yarn95 and yarn for dos"
In reply to: jdashiel@eagle1.eaglenet.com: "Re: file attachments"
Next in thread: jdashiel@eagle1.eaglenet.com: "Re: file attachments"
Next in thread: Debra Walker: "Re: file attachments"

On Sun, 9 Mar 1997 13:55:37 -0500 (EST),
in article <Pine.NXT.3.95.970309135405.8816I-100000@eagle1>,
jdashiel@eagle1.eaglenet.com wrote:

>That's mpack*.zip not munpack.
>Probably the worst mime decoder on the planet too, but find out for
>yourself.

I have been using munpack/mpack with Yarn for quite some time, and I
haven't had any problems. Do you have any suggestions for alternative
programs to use? I run Yarn95.

Debra Walker

-- 
Debra Walker            debraw@wwa.com          
Chicago, IL             debra42@juno.com

Next message: David Meade: "Re: What are the differences between yarn89 and yarn92?"
Previous message: Debra Walker: "Re: yarn95 and yarn for dos"
In reply to: jdashiel@eagle1.eaglenet.com: "Re: file attachments"
Next in thread: jdashiel@eagle1.eaglenet.com: "Re: file attachments"
Next in thread: Debra Walker: "Re: file attachments"