Re: What are the differences between yarn89 and yarn92?

From: Robert L. Keeney Jr. (rkeeney@ibm.net)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 97 07:06:58 -0500

I've been using 0.92 for several weeks with OS/2 3.0 and 4.0. I've had no
problems with it.

n Sun, 09 Mar 1997 16:56:32 -0800, David Meade wrote:

>For me, the 0.92 os/2 version is unstable as compared to the 0.88 and 0.89
>versions. I get SYS3175's after every 10 to 20 minutes of use. I regret
>upgrading to 0.92 and wish I had a way to go back to 0.89.
>

--
Robert L. Keeney Jr.
rkeeney@ibm.net