Re: Uqwk rate?

From: Phil Crown (pcrown@airmail.net)
Date: Fri, 09 May 1997 01:33:22 -0500

If your news server is INN 1.5.1, there is a known bug (not really a
bug, but a design problem).

If you ask for an ARTICLE (or a HEAD/BODY and possibly other commands
more than 100 times), INN sleeps for a second before sending anything.
It sleeps each time you ask for an ARTICLE, but only sleeps on HEAD/BODY
commands if you've asked for them more than 100 times.

The ISP can toggle this with the LIKE_PULLERS flag in config.data and
recompile INN.

I believe VSoup will use the HEAD/BODY commands if you have a kill file,
otherwise it uses the ARTICLE command. I don't know about Souper.

See news.software.nntp for more on INN, or grep nnrpd/article.c for
DONT_LIKE_PULLERS to see the problem.

Kermit Roger (KR) Lund wrote:
>
> Since my ISP installed a new news server, the time it takes to
> retrieve new posts and mail seems much longer. I must admit that
> I never measured the time required in the past. I'm curious about
> what others observe.
>
> I measure the elapsed time that uqwk runs. (from uqwk start
> until the compression starts and divide that into the
> uncompressed size of news/mail. I get about 2.2K/sec. I had to
> manually unzip the compressed file that was downloaded to get the
> size.
>
> Does anyone have any comparative information?
> Thanks
> krl
> --
> It is not enough to succeed; others must fail - Gore Vidal
> Kermit Roger (KR) Lund krlund@garlic.com
> 11880 Columbet Ave. Gilroy CA 95020 ph 408-683-2111

-- 
Phil Crown  pcrown@airmail.net  http://web2.airmail.net/pcrown/