* support for long file names
* stability in a 32-bit environment
* support for alternate code pages
* ability to use windows programs (e.g., editors) as support tools f/Yarn
I think I've got that list right. Anyway, I've got questions...
1) Are these compelling? Are there other benefits to using Yarn95 in a
Win95 environment?
2) So far I've had no problems with Yarn/DOS under Win95, so I'm not sure if
there are stability issues or what the stability benefits are.
3) I know I can launch windows programs from a DOS or 4DOS session today
under Win95. Is it possible (I've not tested) that Yarn/DOS can just do
this with a standard Exec call (however it launches an editor today)?
- DaveL