> html support in yarn would be the single strongest argument in favour
> of trn that I can imagine.
Heh. Or slrn. It would be nice to be able to do what slrn does, tho, and
simply flip the URL to the configured browser (if any).
> While I've got your attention, may I also take the opportunity to ask
> if anyone has seriously pursued the concept of a linux (or FreeBSD :)
> port of yarn that was tossed about the list a few months back. Now
> there's a feature I'd like to see...
I've seen Chin posting in the context of the Windows 95 slrn port in one
of the newsreaders groups, but I've not heard anything back about Yarn at
all. :-( I guess we don't exist. :-)
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> rsteiner@skypoint.com >>>---> Bloomington, MN
Written online using Pine 3.96 for Linux (Red Hat)!
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.