Re: Yarn under Win98

From: John A. Stanley (jstanley@gate.net)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 15:16:51 -0500

In article <001501be89ca$e77116e0$9cfa14d1@system350.nwlink.com>,
"Counselor" <counselor@geocities.com> wrote:
>You'll not tempt any criticism of Win98 out of me. In fact, I've
>found Win98 to be the most stable Windows OS yet. It's *way* better
>than Win 3.1 imho.

Amen!

>I learned that there is (or at least was) a bug in the
>Bohrland compiler which made programs using that compiler to not work
>on fast processors. This is certainly the case with yes.

Well, I gave up on Yes because I got tired of the slowness with which it
loads, but couldn't the source code simply be recompiled on a more robust
compiler? Is Yes another case of orphaned freeware?

-- 
John A. Stanley                       jstanley@gate.net