That's basically the path I took, but I ended up using OS/2.
>>Why not to something more attune to the Internet as a whole and do it
>>in java?
>
> Java applications have a tendency to run slow on older hardware.
>NetZero's software is in Java and is very slow on my old '486. Yarn95,
>however, runs an order of magnitude faster there.
>
My experience varies and I understand where you're coming from. I "just"
upgraded my hardware recently and now run a speed demon of a computer... A
166mhz pentium... ;') Life has never been better and my old 486 is now doing
server duty...
>>But having the Yarn source code to "read as you write" would be a blessing. And
>>writing to the JVM would be a bigger blessing for all of us, not just a few
>>specific platforms...
>
> Fwiw, if I had the source to Yarn, the first thing I would do is
>covert/translate it to assembly language where I feel most comfortable.
>:)
>
Wow! My hat is off to you, Sir.
--
/--------------------\ | Jerry McBride | | mcbrides@erols.com | \--------------------/
--