This is a public reply to your message posted:
From group: list.yarn; on Sun, 02 Jan 2000 12:35:57 +0100
Concerning "Re: Yarn ver89 is Y2K compliant";
~ > Richard Steiner <rsteiner@visi.com>:
~ > : > Yarn ver89 is Y2K compliant.
~ > : >
~ > : > Were you guys with version 91 equally fortunate?
~ > :
~ > : I dunno about 0.91, but 0.92 seems fine (to me). :-)
~ >
~ > My 0.91 works too :)
~ >
~ > .pk.
On 23 Mar 1999 18:53:30 -0500 Jerry Levy <jlevy@ibm.net> left our
exclusive group. Since then, you, alone in the world, have been using
version .91.
When Chin eventually releases the code, I expect to spend about six
months converting it so that the message base is broken up into
separate chunchs by news group. Then I'll be able to upgrade too.
I'm sure that the experience will teach me more about C++ than I could
possibly have learned in any other way.
-- Friar Broccoli Robert Keith Elias (Quebec, Qc, Canada) Address: kelias@CLIC.NET Best programmer's & all purpose text editor: http://www.semware.com--------- I consider ALL arguments in support of my views ---------