This is a public reply to your message posted:
From group: list.yarn; on Mon, 03 Jan 2000 13:01:19 -0500
Concerning "Re: Yarn ver89 is Y2K compliant";
~ > kelias@clic.net (Robert Keith Elias) wrote:
~ >
~ > > Yarn ver89 is Y2K compliant.
~ >
~ > > Were you guys with version 91 equally fortunate?
~ >
~ > I've got .92 for Win95, and it seems to be behaving. And, at home I've
~ > got .91, and it seems fine, too. I'm happy.
Dirk, you cad. You have robbed Piotr of his one chance in life to
stand out from the crowd :-(
~ > +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
~ > | Dirk A. Loedding <*> judge@america.net |
~ > +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
~ >
-- Friar Broccoli Robert Keith Elias (Quebec, Qc, Canada) Address: kelias@CLIC.NET Best programmer's & all purpose text editor: http://www.semware.com--------- I consider ALL arguments in support of my views ---------