In article <Pine.GSO.4.10.10001091219210.13217-100000@shell.america.net>,
"Dirk A. Loedding" <judge@america.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2000, Andrew Hodgson wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > In article <BMNd48MBAD1W092yn@america.net>,
> > judge@america.net (Dirk A. Loedding) wrote:
> > > kelias@clic.net (Robert Keith Elias) wrote:
> > >
> > > >~ > I've got .92 for Win95, and it seems to be behaving. And, at home I've
> > > >~ > got .91, and it seems fine, too. I'm happy.
> > >
> > > > Dirk, you cad. You have robbed Piotr of his one chance in life to
> > > > stand out from the crowd :-(
> > >
> > > Actually, I lied. I thought I had .91 at home, but it turned out not to
> > > be the case. Sorry... :)
> >
> > I don't soppose its still avalable on the internet :-)))
>
> Actually, I have a copy of the ZIP for .91. Let me know if you're
> interested, and I can put it up on my mydocsonline space. In fact, I have
> .90 and .92, as well as .90 and .92 in the Windows flavor, though I'm not
> sure the .90 Windows file is complete, as it's substantially smaller than
> the one for .92.
>
> Anyway, anyone who wants a copy of any of these, let me know either on the
> list or privately, and I'll stick it up either on my web page or on
> mydocsonline.
>
>
>
>
That would be great, though I don't soppose there is much difference
betwene 90/91/92.
- --
Sincerely,
Andrew.
6 blondes in a Volkswagon = Compressed air.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.1i
iQA/AwUBOHoDi97wNnqMg6tDEQIASQCguB3JkhlqsNclzpYfOAvstZf4xfwAoKxm
WFlWD6DuoGu12vo6BVJt1Wbg
=ig7a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----