> > Sure wish there was a real 32-bit version so that I can run it under
> > NT with it's flat memory space.
>
> I thought the DOS YARNX.EXE was a 32-bit protected-mode version? It
> seems to use a DOS extender of some type.
I have problems with the editor i use - Qedit. And Yarn itself behaves
rather wierdly under the NT DOS-emulation box.
> FWIW, the OS/2 version is most certainly 32-bit. Maybe this is a
> stupid question, but shouldn't the Windows 95 version work in NT?
It does work. I have pointed out to Vince about a couple of problems,
namely, I run my DOS apps in 80 char x 60 line windows with a 200 line
buffer.
The size of the window and the screen buffer size confuses Yarn95 such
that it gives me blobs of color pixels everytime I scroll.
Maybe someone conversant with Win32 programming could help out with code
for making a Win NT version which handles OLE or DDE so that I can use a
true 32-bit editor like PFE.
Just another of my (numerous) wishes for Yarn. <g>
James